Tasman District Council Regional Cycling and Walking Strategy June 2005

p2 Review Strategy in 2007 so TDC can “revisit its priorities”[Comment: Review is one year overdue, why? Lack of TDC Staff ownership or prioritisation?

Future Strategy should have major review aligned with Long Term Council Community Plan (LTCCP) reviews i.e. 3-yearly review, and annual monitoring and review with TDC Annual Plan

 p2 TDCs “priority under this strategy is to focus on the development of specific cycling and walking networks in urban areas where there is greatest existing and perceived demand for improved cycling and walking facilities”. “Strategies need to be reviewed periodically to ensure that they continue to represent the aspirations of the community and council.  Strategies should be reviewed according to the timeframe of the LTCCP. This ties them strongly to implementation programmes and budgets, and is consistent with advice in the LTMA that encourages Land Transport Programmes to be integrated with the LTCCP review process.Implementation programmes need to be revised annually to reflect the budget cycles of councils, whereas strategies should only need revision every 3 to 10 years.  Consequently, a clear mechanism needs to be articulated in the strategy as to how and when the strategy and implementation programmes are to be reviewed.” [Page 27 New Zealand walking and cycling strategies-best practice (2005) Macbeth AG, Boulter R, Ryan PS.  Land Transport NZ Research Report 274] p3 Section 2: Vision, Objectives, and Targets 

OBJECTIVE 1: To increase the percentage of people cycling/walking to work, recreationally, or school Targets[Note: numbering added as these were just bullet points]1. Percentage cycling/walking increases by 2011Q) What percentage is cycling/walking?  Has this been successful?  2.  At least 15% intermediate/high school children in urban areas cycle to school (by 2007 when strategy due for review?), 20% by 2011Q) What are the current figures? Suggestion: Include a target to increase numbers walking to school in urban areas also? 3.  Regular daily pedestrian and cycle counts show increasing trend in walking and cyclingQ) Have counts been done? Q) What trends are shown? 4.  Cycling and walking satisfaction measures are developed and implemented over the life of this strategyQ) Have these measures been developed and implemented?[Krista: done twice a year, Richmond (2x), Motueka (1-2x), Winter and Summer?]5.  Work to increase the provision of walkways and cycle facilities, measured against Council's current databaseQ) Have the number of walkways and cycle facilities increased in relation to the Council's database and the Maps in Appendix A which have proposed pedestrian trails and shared use paths? Q) Is it a policy to do shared paths rather than separate walking and cycling facilities separate are considered best practice (see new Pedestrian Guidelines page ?) 

OBJECTIVE 2:To reduce the number of injuries involving pedestrians and cyclists Targets[Note:  numbering added as these were just bullet points]

1.  TDC implements a system of identifying and recording unreported accidents

Q) Was system identified and process of recording undertaken? 2.  Between 1998-2002 an average of 7 injury accidents annually, between 1998-2002 average of 9 injury accidents annually.  Reduce accident rates to zeroQ) What should this correctly say between 2002-2006?   Q) What is the current accident rate? 

OBJECTIVE 3:To increase the understanding and response to the identified needs of cyclists and pedestrians Targets[Note: numbering added as these were just bullet points]1. Council officers involved in the design and implementation of cycling and pedestrian facilities attend appropriate courses in cycle and pedestrian network planning and designComment: TDC engineers did not attend the Walking Workshop in early 2008, why not?Q) Are engineering and planning staff attending the heavily subsidised by Nelson Marlborough Fundamentals of Planning and Design for Cycling course to be held on June 25? 2.  New road construction, reconstruction, and maintenance are undertaken in ways that enhance cycling and walking and support achievement of this strategy's objectives.Q) Has this been achieved?  3.  A pedestrian and cycling related questionnaire is intended for inclusion in the tri-annual “National Research Bureau”Q) Did this occur? 
p4 Section 3: Initiatives to improve cycling and walking [Note: This section needs to be laid out better so plan is clear including who, what, when to undertake the actions] (p2 Series of initiatives TDC will pursue or support to achieve the vision (p4 vision is a district being a safe and enjoyable place to cycle and walk) and objectives (see 3 objectives above and on p3 of the Strategy)“These initiatives are not an exclusive list and Council may wish to trial alternative initiatives appropriate to a particular situation.” (p4 Strategy) 3.1 Education Initiatives       Schools targeted for road safety campaignscorrect use of: bikes, helmets, lights, safe routes to school, cycling and walking facilitiesCurrently services supplied by police, road safety co-ordinators, public health teams within Tasman/Nelson region-TDC continue to support their efforts through TDC Road Safety Co-ordinator 

Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
        Promote (economic, social, environmental) benefits of cycling and walking-TDC promotions to include those help to connect work places, schools, and general community  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

        Road Safety Campaigns(1)   -TDC periodically run media and targeted road safety campaigns to motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians, on important pedestrian and cycling safety issues (on/off road facilities, driveways, intersections, or where motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians mix), may focus on vulnerable road users (e.g. recreational walkers/cyclists) and higher risk users (e.g. older people and children)(2)   -Develop “Skid Lids” website further in 2005 to provide cycle safety info. to children and parents in interactive way to encourage discussion and participation on road safety issues. 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

  
       Promote Safe Cycling and Pedestrian HabitsSafety stats show failure to see car/cyclist leading cause of cycle/car crashes in Tasman districtSo, encourage cyclists and pedestrians to take reasonable and appropriate measures (e.g lights, reflective clothing) to make themselves more visible and heighten awareness of other road users by drivers in high risk situations (e.g. intersections), “look twice for bikes” 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

        Council Staff learning about cyclist and pedestrian needsTDC ensure staff have appropriate knowledge of this strategy and their work supports strategy's objectives, through:(1)   -training in network planning and design(2)   -consultation with stakeholders(3)   -interaction with national and local authorities in the delivery of cycling and pedestrian services 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     

Comments:

 
  3.2 Encouragement InitiativesEncourage use of cycling and walking as transport esp. short journeys to reduce the need for car parking, reduce vehicle emissions, improve public health, and for environmental benefits        Ensure pedestrian and cyclist representationTDC implementation and review (2005? as done in 2002 and reviewed 3-yearly) of RLTS is representative of user groups identified in this strategy and ensure pedestrian and cycling needs represented on RLTC. 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

Q) Did this occur? What about RLTC representation?
         Encourage recreational walking and cyclingCurrent booklets identify and promote-Ongoing development of recreational walkways and cycle facilities and improvement of recreational opportunities is aim of Council's Community Services Dept. Appendix A identifies where work is to occur
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
        Promote and provide secure public cycle parking (esp. work sites, urban centres and schools)(1)   -TDC to design and implement safe cycle storage as part of its Warring Car park upgrade in -Richmond and implement cycle parking solutions in and around urban centres(2)   -Promote provision of cycle-friendly facilities at work sites and school(3)   -Provide cycle parking in smaller outlying centres 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     

Comments:

  
        Promotes Cycling and Walking for Short Tripsby combining cycling with public transport options e.g. bike racks at bus stops, bikes on busesTDC provide a range of engineering services-e.g. develop an incentive programme reducing the need for car parking for those employers who actively support walking & cycling to work-e.g. land use planning and urban design complements cycling and walking as viable commuter option-e.g. Install cycle parking facilities encourage use or where high identified demand. 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     

Comments:

  
        Encourage Cycle Tourism(1)   -Investigate potential local cycle tourism market(2)   -Develop old Nelson to Kawatiri Railway (but much private ownership of land)(3)   -Signage to support cycle tourism and rely on networks  proposed in Strategy to service cycle tourists(4)   -Dedicated tourism services e.g. Nelson to Kawatiri 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     

Comments:

Q) Did this occur? What about RLTC representation? 
        Streets and Public Spaces perceived as secure (e.g. via urban design e.g. lighting levels, signage, passive surveillance, high levels asset maintenance) and enjoyable for people to walk and cycle-TDC will review public spaces to identify and undertake improvements in relation to personal safety 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
 g) Integrate cycling and walking into land use planning-Encourage cycling and walking through its District Plan by including the primary cycling and walking routes identified in this Strategy, and objectives, policies, and appropriate implementation methodse.g. rules for cycle parking and storage, off-street parking, developers required to incorporate sections of identified walkway or cycle facilities into their development  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

 
        Publise Cycling and Walking in TDC e.g. (1)   -periodic articles in Newsline about topical cycling and walking issues and initiatives - Done?(2)   -links from Council's web page to local cycle and walking clubs -Done?(3)   -provide cycle and walking network maps -Done?(4)   -provide network signage to indicate recommended cycling and waking routes-Done?(5)   -promote recreational walking and cycling via redesigning and updating Bike and Walk Tasman brochures - Done/(6)   -Community informed of cycling and walking as a viable daily transport option via free maps showing cycling facilities and urban links-Done?(7)   -Council support and promote a broad range of promotional events form national promotions e.g. safekids and National Bike Week to local neighbourhood fun rides and “ride-to-school” days 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
 3.3 Engineering InitiativesTDC encourage demarcated spaces for cyclists where possible including on state highways and esp. in hazardous areas e.g. by using designated cycle lanes, cats eyes, or “vibraline” to deter motorised traffic wandering into the shoulder of the roadQ) How well has this been achieved?        Network Planning and Development of a primary cycle network is a core function of this Strategy.(1)   -Identify primary cycle and walking routes to be developed-done as part of this strategy development see Appendix A(2)   -Develop a booklet of on-road facilities as these are developed(3)   -Establish a range of regular cycling and pedestrian counts taking account of seasonal and daily factors- Counts integrated into investigation for those routes identified as priorities in the 5-year programme (see Appendix C) (4)   -Integrate cycling and walking into mainstream transportation planing so mainstream infrastructure improvements (resealing roads, road reconstruction, intersections upgrades) include cycling and walking desirable feature, to prevent retrofitting-5-year programme of works identified opportunity(5)   -Audit roading projects to ensure opportunities to improve cycling and walking conditions are properly identified and considered(6)   -Develop off-road cycling and walking tracks in accordance with recently published Stds NZ Handbook Tracks and Outdoor Visitor Structures(7)   -Safety inspection after completion of cycling or walking facility, and any remedial works actions ASAP(8)   -Ensure existing and proposed pedestrian facilities designed to appropriate engineering standards-(9)   -Ensure suitable and sufficient bike racks installed at appropriate locations around popular cycle destinations, mostly CBD areas of Tasman District towns, and create a map of locations of these(10)                        TDC to consider funding on a future basis of new racks to be installed and replace existing racks where required with appropriate suitable and configuration 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
         Networking Walkways and Cycle Facilities in New SubdivisionsTDC continue to encourage developers/subdividers to provide cycling and walking facilities for amenity (pleasant and safe to walk and cycle so providing alternative off road route), connectivity (ensure linkages provided between road networks and other pubic areas and facilities e.g. reserves, carparks, swimming pools so provide alternative and possibly more direct route), personal security in design and layout of subdivisions to encourage walking and cycling.  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

 
        Cycle Coordinator[Note: Should call this a Walking & Cycling Coordinator too, this represents a huge resourcing opportunity for Nelson and Tasman re walking and cycling]-TDC supports initiative for provision of regional Cycle Facility Coordinator services by all three Road Controlling Authorities (i.e. Transit, TDC, NCC), to review roading and cycling projects including road accessway for new developments from a cyclist's perspective and could [should!] also advocate for pedestrians 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

  
        Signage(1)   -All signage including directional signage relating to pedestrians and cyclist shall comply with Ministry of Transport Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings (MOTSAM) and NZ Supplement to the AustRoads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14: Bicycles(2)   -Nelson CC has a separate guide for directional signage TDC wishes to adopt to ensure regionally consistency and coordination 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

 
         Urban Area satisfies pedestrian and cyclist needs(1)   -Provide street amenity features that encourages safe pedestrian movements e.g. tactile pavers, cycle friendly built out pedestrian crossing, shade trees, and appropriate lighting in accordance with accepted engineering practice(2)   -Provide/require provision of dedicated short and long term cycle storage facilities at popular cyclist destinations(3)   -Traffic calming measures in urban centres (Richmond, Motueka, Takaka) to favour pedestrians over vehicles(4)   -Ensure roads and off-road footpaths and cycle facilities are safe environments with Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principals integrated into the design.(5)   -Programme maintenance of these facilities to ensure consistent level of service across all facilities 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
          Safe Routes to School (SRTS) identified and implements to promote safe and enjoyable cycling to school(1)   -SRTC assessment in consultation with parents and students to identify travel modes, routes, and hazards(2)   -Outcomes SRTC (e.g. engineering treatments, educational and promotional campaigns in schools, and traffic enforcement around schools)(3)   -TDC to promote benefits of SRTS to schools and Ministry of Education and actively involved in SRTS consultation and identification of engineering solutions (e.g. road crossings, off-road facilities, schools speed zones, or parking restrictions)(4)   -TDC work with schools on safer routes and travel plans   
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
  Safety Auditing of Existing Facilities(1)   -TDC road maintenance contractors periodically currently inspects existing footpaths and on road cycle facilities.(2)   Audits should be done periodically and done as per best practice for Cycle (Austroads) & and pedestrian facilities (Pedestrian Network Planning and Facilities Design Guide).  Invite cycling and pedestrian advocacy groups to be part of auditing of existing facilities(3)   -Auditing of new and proposed facilities funded by Land Transport NZ (follow published guidelines by Land Transport NZ, Road Safety Audit Procedures for Projects Guideline)(4)   -TDC to determine which of 4 audit stages (feasibility, preliminary design, detailed design, post construction) to audit.  Cycle advocates given opportunity to comment at detailed design stage.[Note: Should be pedestrian and cyclist able to comment and both groups should be offered opportunities to comment at all 4 stages]   
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
         Safety ImprovementsTDC has access to Land Transport NZ funding for “minor safety improvements' (projects < $150,000)  and funded 59%) to help ensure a safe walking and cycling environment(1)   -TDC will target minor safety improvement projects at: i) intersections with historical identified safety issues or where walking and cycling being promoted and there are potential hazards (e.g. on-road parking, narrow roads, high traffic volumes or speeds)  ii) bridges, culverts, and other structures impeding safe passage of pedestrians and cyclists, and (2)   -Specific Sections identified in this strategy requiring attention are identified in the route plans and 5-year programme(3)   -TDC to work with Transit to ensure consistency of service   
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     

Comments:

 
         Utilising paper roads, esplanade reserves, and local purpose reserves to develop off-road cycle ways and walking trails to encourage recreational and/or commuter cycling and walking is a core function of Council's Community Services and Assets Departments-NB: Consideration given to paper roads and esplanade reserves in this strategy and future trails will be identified when Strategy reviewedQ) What other trails are wanted by walkers and cyclists? 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

 
         Services developed in accordance with Engineering Standards based on internationally accepted engineering practice for cycling and walking.  Facilities proposed depend on the function of the road withing the network e.g arterial routes need better facilities due to higher vehicle volume's, sped, and complexity of driving environments than local roads (See Appendix E for types of facilities adopted by TDC for new roads, and where possible road upgrades) 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     

Comments:

 
        Speed Control MechanismsSignage, physical structures to limit vehicle speeds and allow for safe passage of pedestrians and cyclists.  E.g. “School Zones” (temporary reduced speed limits during times children arriving or leaving school where school traffic merges onto high speed, high volume roads and traffic speeds cause safety concerns)TDC will:(1)   -Provide official warning signage in areas of high cycling or pedestrian numbers, or where specific safety issues need to be highlighted (e.g. narrow bridges)(2)   -Install physical measures (e.g. urban thresholds) where appropriate to improves safety (3)   [What are “urban thresholds”?](4)   -Assess the need for “school zones” in areas where safety of school children is at risk from vehicle speeds or volumes in accordance with Land Transport NZ warrant\(5)   -Delineate on-road or off-road facilities where traffic speed and volume of roads presents a safety hazard to pedestrians or cyclists 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
        Nelson to Kawatiri Junction (at intersection of State highways 6 & 63) trail on old railway reserve Part of original railway reserve corridor running parallel to SH6 and SH60 sold into private ownership and access may no longer be available-Undertake a study to establish feasibility of the Trail  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
         Facility MaintenanceOnce walking or cycling facility constructed it requires regular maintenance to ensure consistent service provided to pedestrian and cyclistsTDC will:(1)   -establish a set of performance standards and provide adequate funding to cover the maintenance of all cycling and walking facilities esp. surface quality , signage, pavement markings, and vegetation control(2)   -regularly inspect cycling and walking routes and undertake necessary maintenance(3)   -establish and publish methods for public to report defects to Councils such as phone numbers, postcards, internet (NOTE: Check TDC website for “fix-o-grams”, “Fix-it” etc)(4)   -inspect cycle and pedestrian routes after storm events, during, and after road works, or property development to ensure debri is removed and appropriate repairs make   
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
  3.4 Enforcement Initiativesvia ensuring compliance with Engineering Standards, Resource Management Plan, enforcement of traffic regulations, road safety monitoring via forms such as the Regional Cycle Forum and Road Safety Action Plans meetings[Note: update Regional Cycle Forum to “Regional Active Transport Forum”]Q) Does any walking or cycling advocate attend the Road Safety Action Planning meetings?        Appropriate Speed limits setTDC required to comply with the “speed warrant” process audited by Land Transport NZ and aimed to set uniform national speeds for similar road conditions, based upon level of roadside development and not the type of traffic mix on the road itself.  Traffic mix is managed by delineation or signage.TDC is unable to change speed limits where this is not supported by a speed limit warrant.-TDC will ensure speed limits are regularly reviewed to ensure they are appropriate for the road environment. [Note: CAN has information about how Councils are able to reduce speed limits]  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
        Maintain high helmet waring ratesTDC to support promotion of waring cycle helmets in conjunction with its road safety education initiative  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
        Be Safe, Be SeenTDC to continue to support enforcement of lights and reflectors as an essential safe cycling feature  through its Road Safety Coordinator in association with NZ Police  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
 d) Obeying Road RulesTDC to continue to support Police efforts in enforcing traffic regulations and run programmes in conjunction with the Police through the road safety coordinator 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 
 Q) Is this an opportunity to increase funding for cycling training initiatives? Is increased funding needed?        Pedestrians using facilities correctly43% pedestrian casualties are on straight roads without crossingsTDC to continue to support Police efforts in enforcing traffic regulations and run programmes in conjunction with the Police through the road safety coordinator 
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     

Comments:

 

p27 Section 6: Implementation, monitoring, and review of strategy Implementation of this Strategy is primary responsibility of the Transportation Manager and Community Services Manager at the TDCQ) Who are these staff at TDC? Monitoring of targets set by strategy (Section 2.3) and actions undertaken by TDC ActionsTDC will endeavor to ensure any proposed cycling or pedestrian facilities are installed as part of any planned road upgrades where synergies are gainedTDC will request Transit NZ co-ordinates planned road upgrades with the installation of new cycling and pedestrian facilities where appropriateBUT depending on type of facility planned this may not always  be possible or desirableQ) What does this last statement, when might it not be possible or desirable? Examples of monitoring actions:(1)   -Cycle and pedestrian use of facilities through cycle and pedestrian counts(2)   -User satisfaction levels through consultation with cycle and pedestrian organisations(3)   -Cycle and pedestrian facility condition through inspection and reporting for maintenance(4)   -Cycle and pedestrian network implementation(5)   -Level of service provided to on-road cyclists(6)   -The enforcement initiatives undertaken by the Police(7)   -Feedback on road safety education campaigns  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
 ReviewStrategy reviewed 3 yearly in line with the revised Regional Land Transport Strategy[Suggest review in line with LTCCP, see comment of page 1 of this report] Q) When was RLTS last reviewed? When is next review due? Consider relevance of the cycling and waking initiative against:(1)   -The revised objectives and policies of the RLTS(2)   -The effectiveness of TDC';s actions under this strategy as measured through monitoring undertaken(3)   -The progress made in developing the primary cycling and walking networks(4)   -Any alteration to priorities as expressed through consultation, network implementation and RLTS or national policy  
Completed successfully Partially completed (date will be competed by?) Not undertaken
     
     
     
     

Comments:

 
  
Appendix A: Cyclist and Pedestrian MapsQ) How much of the proposed shared-use paths and pedestrian trails have been completed for:Richmond?Judy Cox 11/6/08Having a closer look at pg 29 on Richmond Cyclist and Pedestrian Network’, I see my ‘north route’ is already shown as existing – NOT! It’s the dark green line along Whakatu Drive.You definitely need to see this one!The pale green one labeled ‘Railway Reserve’ already exists from Appleby Highway to Queen Street [this is also a dog off leash exercise area – presently the first ½ is all grass not paved or shingle – that happens when it goes behind the sports park], and the rest is scheduled to be done next year.A lot of light industrial and residential development is planned to the north side of this path, so will become more useful when that happens, but at the moment the bulk of buildup is to the south and will have to cross busy roads to get to it – especially at Queen Street [there are plans for major changes for this at it’s intersection with Gladstone Road – the road traffic presently goes in a straight line from Gladstone Road in a straight line onto Whakatu Drive which we call the bypass] and at the 3 Brothers corner roundabout. I had it with me I've just found out. Haven't attached the crashoutlines or sketch details of the 'clip on' for the Appleby bridge. Ifyou need these, let me know and I'll scan and send them.The Richmond Deviation Cycleway is scheduled for next year. This is to goon the sea side, but eventually there is to be one on the town side -where I [unofficially but at the request of Mike T-J] walked and put asmy proposed North Route / Link for Richmond. To me this will be the morevaluable one as it won't require crossing the busy road at the West end.There is an underpass at the East end. I think you need to see thissituation on Wed morn so will put it on my proposed list.Try and get some rest and time off this weekend - I think next week is going to be busy!!  Brightwater?  Wakefield?  Waimea?  Mapua?  Lower Moutere?  Motueka?   Riwaka?  Takaka? (Map 1 & 2)  Collingwood?   
pgs 46- 48Appendix C: Indicative 5-year Progamme of Works of primary cycling and walking routes identified in this strategy, and the two phases (investigation and construction_ of implementing a project Q) How much of the works programme has been completed?    p49 Appendix D: TDC Submission for Transit NZ 10 year State Highway planA list of sites to provide for and improve the safety of pedestrians and cyclists using State highway corridor between Richmond and Collingwood.Priority list (see page 49)Q) How much was included in Transit NZ 10 year State Highway plan?[Fiona has a copy of this plan and will bring to the meeting]  
Groups audience: