Malfroy Roundabout - spot the best practice designing for cyclists

Subject: Malfroy Roundabout - spot the best practice designing for cyclists
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:06:19 +1200
From: mdyer [at] canmaphawley [dot] co [dot] nz
To: calenth [at] hotmail [dot] com; clarrie [dot] hall [at] rdc [dot] govt [dot] nz; david [dot] crawley [at] pfolsen [dot] com; eldad [dot] collins [at] apr [dot] co [dot] nz; jeff [at] kiwibikes [dot] co [dot] nz; Willie [at] wildlands [dot] co [dot] nz
CC: kirsten [at] can [dot] org [dot] nz

Hi,

To start the week, attached is the layout plan for the new roundabout.

This represents ‘best practice’ in Rotorua and so the benefits for cyclists from this design are obvious – or are they?

I’m interested in receiving any comments on how you see cyclists accommodated for in this design and any issues you can foresee if you think not enough has been done.

I will be requesting some specific cycle training to cope with this along with some public education.  Your comments will help with this.

Thanks,

Mark Dyer

AttachmentSize
Malfroy Roundabout.pdf986.8 KB

Comments

Thermal by Bike, Rotorua

I see "Thermal by Bike" Rotorua has won funding for the next stage of the NZ Cycle Trail project. Who is behind this and what does it mean? See http://www.tourism.govt.nz/Our-Work/New-Zealand-Cycle-Trail-Project/

re: thermal by bike

yeah that is good news! This and the Putaruru -> Rotorua Rail corridor trail have been promoted by the MTB club-RDC cabal. Eldad has more info. maybe should post as new thread as now buried under malfroy roundabout - to which it has no relevance

cheers

Malfroy Roundabout

What do people think of the new Malfroy Rd roundabout now that it is complete.

On the whole I am fairly happy with it. As Peter Dine said in an email to me, there is sufficient deflection to force the traffic to slow down and I have found that it does.

I know roundabouts are some people's worst nightmare but I find them OK as long as the traffic is forced to slow down enough so that cyclists can mix in.

Cheers Peter

Hi guys, That looks

Hi guys,
That looks horrendous!
In fact, it looks so awful, I wouldn't even like to go through it in a car. I wonder if it meets recommended practice?
I can't see that there is any hope of modifying it to make it even vaguely safer for cyclists. And it looks awful for pedestrians as well - how does a kid get across 2 lanes of motor vehicles whose drivers are all focussed on looking right to see if they can zoom into the roundabout?
It looks like they will have to remove some houses to do this. Houses generally mean there are people about. I don't know the area, but why are they wanting to channel so much (presumably) motorised traffic through a residential area?
The angles of entry and exit to the roundabout are all designed to enable use at speed. That should be queried.
I'd suggest putting pressure on Rotorua District Council elected reps (ask them if they know what's being planned, and the consequences).
I see the plans were drawn up by Opus - another thing you could try is to suggest they have the design peer-reviewed by cylist/pedestrian specialists in their organisation. Paul Ryan in the Hamilton office is (if still there) a good person, but I understand that Opus have an internal network of cycling specialists.
Let us know what happens - it would be great to have an article in ChainLinks about this. I'm sure there are lots of others around the country having to deal with this sort of plan.
Good luck!
Cheers,
Jane
Jane Dawson
jane [at] can [dot] org [dot] nz

Jane: Thanks for your

Jane:

Thanks for your comments. The roundabout is half constructed at the moment so I am afraid we will have to wait and see. A couple of months ago I asked the question about what provision had been made for cyclists in this design and got no reply. I renewed that question this week and got this reply:

"Road space for cyclists at the new intersection will be greatly improved over what it is now. The roundabout has a significant deflection for motorists providing that requirement to slow down. Cyclists must however share road space with other road users in accordance with the road rules. Specific facilities for pedestrians have been included in the design and the less confident cyclists can allways use these"

I don't quite know what that means but we will see in due course.

Yes, one house had to be modified to make room, that has been done, also a couple of years back, the Council bought a motel that was on the corner and chopped the corner off it.

The roundabout that was there before was ideal for cyclists, the traffic was well calmed and it was easy to go with the flow. But that was the problem, it tends to be calmed for a block or two back. The Council are seeking to improve the flow but I guess at our expense.

I am personally waiting to see but will respond the the above comments when I have experienced the new roundabout.

Cheers Peter

Malfroy Rd Roundabout

I quite happily ride through the current single lane roundabout twice a day with the traffic as the traffic is quite well "calmed" at the moment.

However this new double lane design looks quite scary to me. I can see myself having to launch myself into that middle lane to turn right and then watch for traffic on all sides.

It may be a tedious but safer option to take to the footpath and cross with the pedestrians.

To be honest I see no consessions to cyclists here at all.

Cheers Peter McKellar

hi folks thanks mark for

hi folks

thanks mark for working on this. I am going to post it up at can.org.nz/rotorua. might find more audience and maybe facilitate easier comment. I just googled: "bicycle roundabout best practice" and came up with the bits below. Most cases say that best practice is merging bike lanes into traffic.

Is it possible to get speed bumps put in the traffic lanes to force cars to slow down and thus make it easier for bikes to integrate into traffic lanes (especially if turning right). Some specific signage reminding cars that bikes have "full lane rights" at roundabouts would be good, too.

from wikipedia "roundabouts":
"Statistically, roundabouts are safer than both traffic circles and traditional intersections.[1] The only exception to that exists in large and multi-lane roundabouts where cyclists have a significantly increased crash rate, although fatalities are fewer."

there is an entire wiki section on "Roundabouts and cyclists". from this wike page:

Cycle facilities at roundabouts
Research has shown that even in large circular junctions that lack modern roundabout design features, a high rate of bicycle/motor vehicle crashes occurs when bicyclists are riding around the outside. Design guidance for modern roundabouts recommends terminating cycle lanes well before the entrances, so bicyclists merge into the stream of motor traffic.[24][25]
A 1992 study[26] from the German Transport Ministry's research institute has cast particular light on this issue. The study found that bicyclists' risk is high in all such intersections, but it is much higher when the junction has a marked bicycle lane or sidepath around its outside (see "Marked perimeter cycle lanes" below). The results of this study concerning circular junctions are summarised on the web (in German, but partially translated below).[27] A report about accidents at four-arm roundabouts was published[28] by the UK Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL) (now TRL) in 1984.
Collisions typically occur when a motorist is entering or leaving the circular roadway. A motorist entering the circular roadway must give way to traffic in it, but such traffic will generally keep away from the outside of the circular roadway (as with a vehicle in the photo) if passing an entrance. A bicyclist close to the edge of the roadway is not in the usual position where an entering motorist expects to look for circulating traffic.
When exiting the circular roadway, a motorist must look ahead to steer, and to avoid colliding with another vehicle ahead or with pedestrians on a footpath. As the circular roadway curves away from the exit, the path of a vehicle exiting the circular roadway is relatively straight, and so the exiting motorist may often not need to slow substantially. However, if it is necessary to give way to a bicyclist riding around the outside, the exiting motorist must look toward the rear, to the outside of the intersection. With many vehicles, such as vans, the driver's view in this direction is obstructed. The task burden of the motorist is therefore substantially increased if bicyclists ride around the outside. The resulting conflicts, and more frequent requirements for motorists to slow or stop, also reduce the efficiency of traffic flow which is one of the major advantages of the circular junctions. Cycle lanes around the outside of circular junctions are therefore falling out of favour.

[picture edited out] Marked perimeter cycle lanes
Cycle lanes on St John's roundabout in Newbury, Berkshire, England. This example is from a country where traffic keeps to the left, and traffic in the circular roadway of the roundabout travels clockwise.
An early attempt to deal with the problem was to mark preferential lanes for cyclists. With cycle lanes, bicyclists do not merge into the flow of motor traffic in the roundabout, but rather, they travel around the outside, relieving them of the requirement to merge. The coloured road surface and edge lines of the cycle lanes indicate that motorists are required to give way to bicyclists at all locations where their paths may cross.

[picture edited out] Modern design guidance
The special features of modern roundabouts, including splitter/diverter islands and small diameter of the circular roadway, decrease the speed of motor traffic and so reduce the risk of collisions for motorists as well as cyclists below that of conventional junctions. Design guidance[24] for modern roundabouts recommends terminating cycle lanes well before the entrances, so cyclists merge into the stream of motor traffic. Cyclists who lack the confidence to do this may use the footpaths as pedestrians. Modern design guidance also recommends placing the footpaths far enough from the roundabout so that at least one exiting vehicle can wait without blocking the circular roadway. A roundabout with 2 lanes should place the footpath two car lengths from the junction. (FYI citation 24 is: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide FHWA-RD-00-67, June 2000 (US dept of transport) avail at: http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/00068.htm)
===================================================================
Roundabout retorts
By Joe Ingegeneri: Sans Souci, NSW : 01-Jul-2009
As an avid cyclist and engineer, I have to respond to David Hanson's letter relating to the intersection of Todman Ave and Baker St, Kensington, NSW (AC, Mar/Apr). Mr Hanson stated his frustration at the interruption of bicycle lanes by traffic facilities forcing cyclists to move into the traffic. He indicated these designs contradict the "safety in design" principles and would make the RTA and local Councils liable in the event of an accident.

Traffic practitioners utilise the RTA's NSW Bicycle Guidelines, which are intended to be a best-practice guide and are supported by the Austroads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice, Part 14 - Bicycles and the Australian Standard AS1742.9 - Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 9 Bicycle Facilities.

The guidelines acknowledge that integration of bicycles and vehicles is necessary for some intersections because of the geometry and available area at the intersection. The Austroads guidelines state:

"If the roundabout is designed correctly speeds should be low enough to ensure safe integrations."

And:

"Separate channelisation for cyclists on roundabout approaches is not recommended because of the propensity for left-turning motor vehicles to conflict with cyclists travelling through a roundabout."

Integration of bicycles and motor vehicles through a local roundabout is best practice.

Joe Ingegeneri
Sans Souci, NSW
[http://www.australiancyclist.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=14730]